2012年11月26日星期一

The man goes back to the Supreme Court of the Rolex watch from police

Man Superior filing is intended that what he says gold Rolex watch it right again.

The action was brought by Mr. John Connors, a member of the Traveller community, the court heard that the Rolex UK was purchased in London by his mother for £ 4,000 cash in 2009.

He originally as a gift for the father of Mr. Connors, who followed his son.

Last March, the clock was built by Mr. Connors Guard after stop and search the vehicle. Lawyers acting on his behalf, then filed an application for the watch back to it.

Earlier this month, when the matter came before the Dublin District Court, Mr. Connors said was for Peace evidence that no description accessory Rolex and serial number of the watch in question reported stolen in system Garda PULSE.

Mr. Connors also produced a receipt and contact details of the person from whom you bought the watch. However, issued by Judge Victor Blake, who heard the case, the order to lose the property to the State.

Mr. Connors said that when the order of Judge Blake error of law.

It also claims that the judge acted in excess of its jurisdiction, for reasons as there is no evidence as the owner of the watch was person than Mr. Connors, and there was no evidence before the court to suggest the Mr. Connors obtained through unlawful clock.

Today, in the Superior Court, said Michael O'Higgins, SC to Mr. Connors, Las Villas, Blessington Road, Tallaght, Dublin 24, the evidence before the district court that his client was entitled to a presumption of ownership.

It was clear from the evidence that Judge Blake that Mr. Connors the best claim to the clock, and had no interest in competing in the property.

Proceedings against Judge Blake Garda Commissioner, Ireland and the Attorney General, Mr. Connors seeking annulment loss order Rolex property to the State under the Police Act 1897, and an order requiring Garda Síochána the watch back.

It is also seeking some statement that the provisions of the Police Property Act 1897 repugnant to the Constitution of 1937.

Mr. Connors seeking additional damages for the violation of their constitutional rights and the rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.

In an affidavit before the court, counsel Michelle said Mr. Connors' Sheeran the watch was taken last March after a member of the Garda Síochána who have seen happen to someone else in the vehicle.

He did this because as a member of the Roma community previously had a bad experience related to the seizure of property by the Garda Síochána.

This was rejected by the Garda Síochána, however, the affidavit says.

没有评论:

发表评论